Volume 18 Number 46 Produced: Thu Feb 16 23:18:40 1995 Subjects Discussed In This Issue: Aggadah as Folklore [Yisrael Herczeg] Fish and meat [Yitzchok Adlerstein] Hungarian Minhagim [Sam Gamoran] Niddah Waiting Period Exceptions [Leah S. Gordon] selling land in Israel [Eli Turkel] Surrogate mother - allowed? [Gilad Gevaryahu] THIS-SHNORRER-WILL-PUT-ME-IN-THE-OTHER-PLACE-HAS-VE-SHALOM [Ellen Golden] Title Rabbi [Danny Skaist] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Yisrael Herczeg <heichal@...> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1995 22:02:45 +0200 (IST) Subject: Aggadah as Folklore A recent posting states: >The Talmud is full of Midrashic, anecdotal material, which is not >supposed to be taken literally. For example "a man should not eat >onion for its venom" (Eruvin 29b); "a man should not eat onion and >garlic [starting] from its head but from its leaves" (Beitza 25a), >"a man should not eat meat except at night" (Yoma 75b), "a man >should never walk behind a woman" (Berachot 22a). These are >wonderful folklore stories, c'est tu. The prohibition for a man to walk behind a woman, which is found in Berachot 61a, is discussed in Shulchan Aruch Even HaEzer 21:1 and the commentaries there. As for the other quotations cited, not taking aggadah literally is different from dismissing it as folklore. Taken as folklore, I do not see what makes the above quotations either wonderful or stories. Yisrael Herczeg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: <yitzchok.adlerstein@...> (Yitzchok Adlerstein) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 95 21:46:11 -0800 Subject: Fish and meat My students were intrigued by Josh Backon's contribution regarding the chemistry of mixing fish and meat. The Sefardic contingent was eager to find out, though, whether the Mechaber's similar ban on mixing milk and fish had any equivalent biological defense. Any thoughts? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: <gamoran@...> (Sam Gamoran) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 95 20:47:08 IST Subject: Hungarian Minhagim Greetings from Budapest. [Avi, are there any permanent M-J subscriptions in Hungary? I'm in the Motorola office telnet'ed through Germany, Chicago into Tel Aviv - makes the world smaller and a lot cloer to home!]. [I don't know, anyone out there in Hungary? Mod.] I've been here now for 10 days and had the pleasure of walking to shul almost every day. Most of the Nusach in the small shteebl which I've been attending is familiar (I spent many years in Highland Park N.J. with its Hungarian influences) but some things puzzle me... They have a minhag (custom) here of saying slichot every Monday and Thursday from parshat Shmot through Tetzaveh. I was here on the last Thursday of this period. The slichot are said in the repetition of the Amidah in the beracha "slach lanu" (blessing for forgiveness from sin). The slichot poems that were said were listed in my siddur as being those for the second Monday of BeHaB (Monday-Thursday-Monday after Pesach/Sukkot). This was a Thursday. They said a full slichot including shma koleinu and then continued the regular prayers. After the amidah they started V'ho Rachum and the Thursday Tachunun (Nusach Ashkenaz) Is anyone out there familiar with this minhag? Can anyone tell me about the permissability or lack thereof of certain non-Chalav Yisroel dairy products e.g. cream cheese, butter, etc. The only Chalav Yisroel dairy sold here is raw unpasteurized whole milk which I've bought and boiled but it's not my favorite. How about the permissability of Kellogs Germany (Corn Flakes, etc.) I'm sorta hungry and running out of the stuff I brought from Israel... Budapest is a fascinating city - Jewish and otherwise. I'd be happy to elaborate in private email. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Leah S. Gordon <lsgordon@...> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1995 01:40:04 -0800 Subject: Niddah Waiting Period Exceptions In reference to the recent postings detailing exceptions to the five day waiting period before the "seven clean days,"-- Would it be permissable (has anyone ever heard of a decision) for a woman to use a technique like menstrual extraction to shorten her period, and then start counting days (in whichever case)? Menstrual extraction, by the way, is a quasi-medical outpatient procedure during which the uterine lining is removed much more quickly than it would otherwise be shed. (It is used in some cases to alleviate menstrual discomfort, and was also an underground technique for early abortions.) I have never heard this issue discussed, so I am curious to hear any opinions. Leah S. Gordon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: <turkel@...> (Eli Turkel) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1995 09:53:40 -0500 Subject: selling land in Israel I uploaded an article on shemitta over a year ago (Special_Topics/heter_mechirah2) that discusses the various arguments for and against the heter mechira. I enclose here, again the portion that deals with seeing land in Israel. IV. The sale is not "real" Is one allowed to sell land when there is no intention to ever really transfer the property and it is only a trick to get around the shemitta rules? In addition the sale is never recorded in "Tabu" where all transfers of land are legally recorded. Part of the controversy is whether this is easier or more difficult than the similar situation with selling chametz which is generally recognized. V. Lo Tachanem (don't show them favor) The Torah forbids selling land in Israel to a nonJew (Devarim 7-2 and Bamidbar 23-33). This undermines the entire heter mechira. Several answers were developed to avoid this problem. 1. Most land in Israel belongs to gentiles anyway and so the prohibition of Lo Techanem doesn't apply. Furthermore, the burden of taxes shows that the land really belongs to the government anyway. 2. The sale is only temporary and so doesn't violate the prohibition. 3. Sell only the crops and the dirt attached to them and not the entire land. 4. The prohibition doesn't apply to Arabs who do not worship idols. Those who oppose the heter mechirah disagree with these answers. Furthermore they claim that if the land is sold through an agent than the sale is not legal because an agent cannot perform illegal acts (ain shliach ledvar averah). The Chazon Ish concedes that if a farmer would sell the land without an agent then the sale is legal even though it is not permitted. Hence the farmer would violate various issurim but the consumer could then buy the produce (treating it with holiness according to the Chazon Ish). <turkel@...> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: <gevarya@...> (Gilad Gevaryahu) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1995 18:16:21 -0500 Subject: Surrogate mother - allowed? REPORT FROM THE ISRAELI PRESS (Ha'aretz, February 14, 1995 by Ilan Shachar) The [Israeli] Chief Ashkenazic Rabbi, Israel Lau, said yesterday that the Chief Rabbinate [of Israel] will agree to "pundekaut" (surrogate) [arrangements] under the following strict requirements: [a] that the woman, carrying the fetus, is not married to someone else [single], [b] that there be kept a detailed record of the biological mother [the owner of the egg] and the carrying mother, to avoid mamzerut, [c] that the born baby will be formally adopted, and [d] that prior approval of this procedure will not be given automaticlly, but each case will be evaluated individually, [e] and that the above procedure will not be enacted as a law, but rather as a regulation. Both Chief Rabbis met a couple of months ago with the health minister Ephraim Sneh, and discussed with him the issue of surrogate motherhood. According to Rabbi Lau, they conditioned their approval [of this procedure] only if it will not be done on en mass, but that each case will be individually evaluated by a special commission, and that in this commission will be [at least] a member who will represent the halachic perspective. [Rabbi] Lau expressed the hope that these commissions will not issue wholesale permits to surrogate motherhood similar to what was given [committee approval] to abortions. [Rabbi] Lau emphasized that the Rabbinate examined the topic of surrogate motherhood with great trepidation and [came up] with many exceptions. Adding an extra limb to a family is changing Sidrei Bereshit (natural order). "The question of how much human involvement should be inputed in Godly matters" he said. "When fertility routes do not work then the adoption options should be sought". According to [Rabbi] Lau, the Rabbis are unhappy with the fact that Israel became one of the first countries which is attempting to incorporate surrogate motherhood into the law. The Rabbis are afraid of a situation where the Kneset will legitimize surrogate motherhood, and become a pioneer in the area, and it will become a mass movement. As a result of this he conditioned his approval that it be regulated and not enacted as a law. The Chief Sephardic Rabbi, Eliyahu Bakshi Doron, said that there are many poskim [halachic authorities] that object to surrogate motherhood because of the many halachic difficulties which it creates. According to him, the act itself [of implanting a fertilized egg into the womb of the surrogate mother] is not prohibited halachicly as long as the carrying woman is single. [Rabbi] Bakshi Doron emphasized that he will recommend to families, especially frum, to go the route of adoption and not surrogate motherhood. Most of the halachic problems of surrogate motherhood surround the issue of who is the mother. Most Rabbis ruled that the carrying mother is the halachic mother [not the woman whose egg was fertilized]. Therefore, the rabbis requested that the baby be formally adopted. Another requirement is that there will be a detailed record of the details of both mothers in order to avoid marriage between siblings and mamzerut. Both Rabbis also required that the carrying mother will be single, in order to avoid implanting the egg in a woman who is married to someone else. Despite all the restrictions [listed above] this permission might bring a confrontation between the Chief Rabbinate and the haredim. The two most prominent halachic authorities of the haredim - Rabbis Yosef Shalom Elyashiv and Shlomo Zalman Aurbach - are against surrogate motherhood. Translated from Hebrew by Gilad J. Gevaryahu [square brackets material is mine--Trans.] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: <egolden@...> (Ellen Golden) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 95 01:27:38 EST Subject: THIS-SHNORRER-WILL-PUT-ME-IN-THE-OTHER-PLACE-HAS-VE-SHALOM In Volume 18 Number 17, <RWERMAN@...> (Bob Werman) wrote: There is one shnorrer who is my nemesis and has clearly been sent to test me. I fail this test over and over again. This shnorrer refuses to give me change when I ask for it. This shnorrer begs in the most demeaning way, to him and to me, no holds barred. This shnorrer is to be found purchasing clothes in the most expensive men's shops in Jerusalem. ... I am being doomed to the other place, has ve shalom, by this man. I am being tested again and again, and I fail the test. Doesn't a person have the responsibility to do honest work to support himself if he is able (or herself if she is able), and not sponge off others? It seems to me that supporting spongers is not tsdakah, since tsdakah should go to those who really have no way to provide for themselves. I cannot feel that I had given tsdakah just because I gave up a tenth of my income, unless I feel that it has gone to legitimate needs. If it hasn't, it wasn't tsdakah, it was just money thrown away. How can that achieve anything? V. Ellen Golden <egolden@...> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: DANNY%<ILNCRD@...> (Danny Skaist) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 95 10:49 IST Subject: Title Rabbi >Zvi Weiss >2. The "Legal" right to "pasken" Religious matters. This is related to what > is referred to as "heter hora'a". >Uri Blumenthal >In short - title "Rabbi" means that the person who has it, is allowed to >pronounce halakhic decisions [in the area of his smichah]. Nothing more, Actually the title "rabbi" gives the person the right to pasken in the same town as his teacher. Anybody may impart knowledge of hallacha if they know it, and we all do it even if we don't realize it. The Hafetz Haim, (as I heard the story) did not have smicha, until late in life when the government required the "paper" for official needs. danny ----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of Volume 18 Issue 46