Volume 49 Number 27 Produced: Mon Aug 1 6:46:38 EDT 2005 Subjects Discussed In This Issue: Aramaic [Ira Bauman] Cellphones [David Charlap] Credit cards for shul dues [Anonymous] Family splitting for summer [Eliezer Wenger] gederot (g'derot) vs. gedarim (g'darim) [Ira L. Jacobson] The Husband Being Absent/Away from the Family [Yisrael Medad] Kaddish Minhag Chabad (3) [Meir, Eliezer Wenger, Elazar M. Teitz] Kashrus Question [Andy Goldfinger] Memoirs of 19th c. Vilna and Radziner Rebbe [<Shuanoach@...>] More on Hitpael, correction [Ira L. Jacobson] Qaddish Pronunciation [Martin Stern] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: <Yisyis@...> (Ira Bauman) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:27:10 EDT Subject: Re: Aramaic Don't take this the wrong way, but have you learned in yeshiva? In my exprience Aramaic was taught concurrently with Talmud. When a new word, idiom or grammatical structure was encountered in the text, it was explained, so that it would be recognized again. As with Hebrew, the roots of words were pointed out to help us recognize related words later on our own. Aramaic was taught in much the same way as Hebrew... concurrently with the text. I'm sure there's a fancy name for that method of language instruction, but not being an "educator" I can't name it. I went to Yeshiva in the sixties. When I was in high school, I questioned why our education in Navi was minimal, our Aramaic and our conversational Hebrew, non-existent. The answer I always got was that when you learn gemara, you absorb those disciplines as well. Thirty five years later, I can prepare a blat gemara, but, according to my Israeli chavrusah,my knowledge of Nach and my conversational Hebrew are both laughable , and my best friend is Marcus Jastrow. I don't think my experience is unique. Mastery of any area of knowledge requires a dedicated effort in that area. My yeshiva was wrong in assuming that we could seamlessly incorporate all different aspects and skills involved in Torah thought by simply poring over a Gemarah. Any modern curriculum must incorporate these other areas into their schedules. Ira Bauman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: David Charlap <shamino@...> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:13:27 -0400 Subject: Re: Cellphones Carl A. Singer wrote: >> >> I'm sorry, these "studies" sound to me like they were bought and paid >> for by anti-cellphone advocates. >> [snip] >> Put another way, if phone usage has no affect on accidents, then you >> should expect to find the percentage of accidents involving phones to be >> equal to the overall percentage of phone usage. If 100% of the >> population should start using phones while driving, then you will >> obviously find phone-usage in 100% of accidents. But this statistic >> will mean nothing, except to a political hack looking to scare the >> population. > > This isn't debate 101. Are we advocating bad science -- if we dislike > what a study says then do we poo-poo it as corrupt then conjecture a > false hypothesis. Apply the above logic to cigarette smoking and lung > cancer and you'll see the hole. I've been following this subject in the news for many years. The anti-phone advocates are not working from a premise of "there are suddenly more accidents, what happened to cause them?" They are starting from a premise of "we want cell phones to be banned, what information can we dig up to force polititians to agree." Their motivation calls the credibility of all their studies into question. And because it's politically correct to ban things that most people like to use, nobody with a dissenting opinion seems to get a voice. This is getting to such an extreme that we now have people claiming that talking on the phone with a headset is more dangerous than driving drunk. If anybody seriously believes this, they need to think about that statement again. If the road was full of drunks, we'd be up to our eyeballs in corpses on the highways. But we're not, even though the road is full of people talking on phones. -- David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Anonymous Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:42:50 Subject: Credit cards for shul dues An interesting controversy recently came up at our synagogue's board meeting. We will, of course, ask our Rabbi for Psak, but wanted to get a sense of what other synagogues are doing in regard to this. We have many members who cannot pay their full dues when they come due in August. Historically, we've gone with "head checks" -- For example, someone who owes, say $400, can write four $100 checks dated Aug, Oct, Dec, February and our treasurer deposits them accordingly. It was recently suggested that we allows credit card payments. That is have someone pay $400 in August via a credit card. There is, of course, a fee that the synagogue would pay for such transactions, but we would receive the money in a more timely fashion. A much more interesting element has been brought to our attention. Some fear that people will end up increasing their credit card debt and paying the rather high credit card interest rates because they choose to pay their dues. This has been compared to putting a stumbling block in front of a blind man. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Eliezer Wenger <ewenger@...> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:17:14 -0400 Subject: Re: Family splitting for summer From: Hillel (Sabba) Markowitz <Sabba.Hillel@...> > From the way the situation is written (such as the halacha of a father > taking a child to the Bais Hamikdash), it seems that the families did > go to Yerushalayim for the Yomim Tovim (especially Pesach). See the > discussions about people leaving the farms empty and mal'achim > protecting them as well. Also the discussions about the Olei Regel > seem to imply that it was full families and not just the men who went. I'm not denying that there were families that went for the Sholosh Regalim, however there was no obligation for them to go as is clearly stated in the first Mishna of Chagiga. We find that Penina and Chana used to go to Shiloh, but after Shmuel was born Chana stopped going until Shmuel was weaned. The only point that I was trying to make was that we cannot compare the situation of family splits for vacation purposes, to family splits where the purpose is for the husband / father to obtain more Yiras Shamayim, which will hopefully make them more effective fathers / husbands during the rest of the year as wass the situation of Aliyah leregel, Yarchei Kallah or visitng one's Rebbe. Those type of family splits were approved by the Torah. Regarding the family splits that take place every summer in many locales is something which the Rabbanim need to interpret. Eliezer Wenger ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Ira L. Jacobson <laser@...> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:17:55 +0300 Subject: Re: gederot (g'derot) vs. gedarim (g'darim) Gilad J. Gevaryahu stated: The only dictionary in my collection that gives both gader (with kamatz tzere) and geder (with segol segol) is Yaakov Prost, Milon Ivri Chadash meIvrirt lePolanit uleGermanit,, Levov, 1912, and this is a rather archaic. First of all, the word geder when used to mean a definition is indeed a literary usage. Now, with regard to plurals: The plural of gader is g'derim (sheva tzere hiriq) or g'derot. The plural of geder is g'darim (sheva qamatz hiriq). Or in other words, the plural of fence can be anything but "g'darim". IRA L. JACOBSON mailto:<laser@...> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Yisrael Medad <ybmedad@...> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:21:20 +0200 Subject: The Husband Being Absent/Away from the Family Eliezer Wenger rejects comparison of summer separations and the custom of Chassidim going away for Yom Tov to their Rebbes and leaving the wives and children at home. In three of his examples (a) Rebbe for Yom Tov, (b) Mekabel Pnei Rabbo and (c) Yarchei Kallah it would seem that the comparison holds because he seems to be looking at the situations only from the male side, not the family side. From the family side, it doesn't make a difference sociologically, psychologically or otherwise. The fact is that the male is not home and in a Jewish family life setting, one would think that it is better for the family to be together, at least that was what the original posting was about, if I remember correctly. For example, visiting a Rebbe was to get more Yirat Shamayim, he writes. Does the family get more Yirat Shamayim? Do they count? Did some Chassidim get a chance to drink liquor and smoke a pipe more than at home? Did they assure the sustenance of their family financially before going or did they depend on the Rebbe, as much as the Rebbe depended upon them? As for his fourth example, Aliyah L'Regel, I think he errs in stating that > it was only on Succos after the Shmittah year (once in every 21 Yomim > Tovim) that the women and children also had to be there for Hakhel. I pointed out in a feminist-related posting that women that women were present and that men carried the children up the steps. Yisrael Medad ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: <meirman@...> (Meir) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:31:54 -0400 Subject: Re: Kaddish Minhag Chabad From: Harry Weiss <hjweiss@...> >You left out the Chatzi Kaddish before the Amidah of Maariv making 18. So what does Kaddish mean when it is there seemingly (to me) to separate parts of the service; how did Kaddish get that role, and , why does there need to be so many? As far as shortening one's parents time in Gehinnom, aiui, surely any shortening comes off the later end. (To take time off the beginning end would require some place to put hir soul until the time to start began.) So if, for example, one says 16 Kaddishes in a day, or whatever the minhag is in one's community, wouldn't the deceased be in Gehinnom that day, while a day came off the far end. And eventually, unless hir time ended earlier because of the deceased's own merit, he will have spent 6 months in Gehinnom before the days at the front bump into the cancelled days at the end. Meir <meirman@...> Baltimore, MD, USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Eliezer Wenger <ewenger@...> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:06:36 -0400 Subject: Re: Kaddish Minhag Chabad Harry Weiss <hjweiss@...> pointed out > You left out the Chatzi Kaddish before the Amidah of Maariv making 18. Yep, that was an oversight. <jf@...> wrote > You can add to that list of Kaddishim the half kaddish after Shemoneh > Esray at ma'ariv of Motz'ay Shabbos I was making a list of the regular three Tefilos during most of the days of the week. If I wanted I could have added the Kaddish Yasom sad after Aleinu of Kiddush Levana as well as the Kaddish Yason said after Aleinu at the end of a Bris Milah. Eliezer Wenger ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Elazar M. Teitz <remt@...> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:07:13 GMT Subject: Re: Kaddish Minhag Chabad The listing of the kadeishim brings up a sore point. Three of the 17 are for Mishnayos after each of the t'fillos. However, it should be pointed out that the kaddish d'rabbanan was instituted for saying after public learning, not for an individual learning in a room where nine or more other men happen to be present, but are not participating in the learning of the mishnayos. Too many Chabad advocates, who happen to be davening in a non-Chabad minyan, will mumble a mishna under their breath and then say a kaddish d'rabbanan. One may be sure that such a kaddish, being improperly said to begin with, is of no value in terms of granting the 90-minute reprieve from heavenly judgment for the departed, if indeed there is such a reprieve to begin with. EMT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Andy Goldfinger <Andy.Goldfinger@...> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:25:58 -0400 Subject: Kashrus Question Botas (Spanish wine flasks) are made of leather. Here is a web site from a vendor: http://www.tienda.com/artisan/botas.html What are the kashrus implications of putting wine in containers made from animal skin? -- Andy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: <Shuanoach@...> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:46:49 EDT Subject: Memoirs of 19th c. Vilna and Radziner Rebbe Does anyone know of any late 19th century memoirs of life in Vilna by rabbis? Also, anyone know where might i find stories and biographical details about R. Gershon Henokh Leiner, oen of the Radziner Rebbes? (i'm looking for books) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Ira L. Jacobson <laser@...> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:18:26 +0300 Subject: Re: More on Hitpael, correction I had stated: That vehisgadilti vehisqadishti appears in Ezekiel I have already stated. But what leads to the conclusion that the first two words of qaddish must be "yisgadal veyisqadash" continues to escape me What I meant to write, of course, was "yisgadel veyisqadesh." The logic still eludes me. Then I wrote: biblical hitpa`el. As I have noted peviuolsy. I meant "previously," of course. I apologize for my errors. IRA L. JACOBSON mailto:<laser@...> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Martin Stern <md.stern@...> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:20:07 +0100 Subject: Re: Qaddish Pronunciation on 27/7/05 10:27 am, Ira L. Jacobson <laser@...> wrote: > An example of the reflexive sense in Aramaic of the root qof dalet shin > is in itqad'shat (Nedarim 50a), she betrothed herself. This cannot be a reflexive formation since nobody, whether male or female, can be betrothed to themself. The phrase "she betrothed herself" must be understood as meaning "she caused herself to be betrothed". Martin Stern ----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of Volume 49 Issue 27