Volume 54 Number 78 Produced: Tue May 29 6:07:18 EDT 2007 Subjects Discussed In This Issue: Bicycle vs Tricycle on Shabbat [Rabbi Wise] Handicapped Accessible shule / bimah [Carl Singer] Historical Data about Hair Covering in Lita [Michael Broyde] Language videos uploaded to TeacherTube [Jacob Richman] Married Women and Hair Covering (2) [Shoshana L. Boublil, Rabbi Wise] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: <Meirhwise@...> (Rabbi Wise) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:29:27 EDT Subject: Re: Bicycle vs Tricycle on Shabbat Your correspondents seem to have missed two obvious points in the bike-trike debate. Firstly a bike has a chain which can come off (my 2 sons used to ride bikes to school) and the fear would be that it would need fixing analogous to a musical instrument. A trike does not. Also a trike is meant for a much younger child who doesnt travel very far. Someone did write that it was more of a toy. Rabbi Wise ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Carl Singer <casinger@...> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 07:55:21 -0400 Subject: Handicapped Accessible shule / bimah > Regarding recent posts about a raised bimah and lowered amud, another > issue we have dealt with is designing those areas to be accessible to > all (i.e., handicap compliant). Designing a bimah with ramps at the > required gentle slope takes a lot of space! I'm wondering if others > have come up with innovative solutions. My current synagogue is in an old semi-converted house -- it barely accessible to the able-bodied let alone handicapped. A dear friend of mine who is wheelchair bound needed help (over the 1 step) into the main sanctuary -- that help was generously forthcoming. My wife's been on the board of two synagogues at the time when they were planning new buildings. One was pretty much a one story layout and had ramps, the other of necessity multi-level has a Shabbos elevator (which is, btw, extremely expensive to build / operate -- can't have it going up & down all Shabbos - 26 hours? - but on timer.) I believe there are different levels of accessibility to be addressed. 1 - access to the main sanctuary -- or wherever the davening takes place. 2 - access to other rooms -- kiddish room, classrooms. 3 - access for an aliyah. I want to address #3 (1) aisles must be wide enough that someone in a wheelchair can approach the bimah (2) if stairs are involved there must be sturdy hand rails and stairs wide enough for a helping hand -- and hopefully not too many stairs. More than once I've seen people either because they are wheelchair bound, or simply because they are elderly / frail, being helped up the few stairs to the bimah for an aliyah. I realize this doesn't meet the needs of everyone, but it works for most situations and is a good start. (3) as for ramps -- I don't think they're practical in most designs -- the only exception I've seen was a synagogue where the bimah was in front near the Aron (no seats in between, both were elevated as on a two-level stage) -- and a ramp from the side (i.e. at right angles to congregants front facing seats) was available. Such a ramp is, by necessity, steep and requires that the oleh be assisted for safety reasons. The related issue is the height of the shulchan, itself, can a seated oleh see over it. The "Gentle slope" to allow unassisted access requires such a gentle pitch that it might take a 20 or 30 foot ramp -- is this practical? I won't get into the halachic issues of erecting (or placing / moving) a "portable" ramp on Shabbos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Michael Broyde <mbroyde@...> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:32:01 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Historical Data about Hair Covering in Lita It is quite clear from both the halachic and historical literature that this uncovering was the practice of the community in Lita (Lithuania) 50 years before World War I, when Orthodox observance and culture was at its strongest. For proof of this, one need only examine the fact that many poskim note this uncovering in the 1870s as already being well established; see e.g. Rabbi Yosef Chaim (Ben Ish Chai) Parshat Bo 12 (writing around 1870). Rabbi Yecheil Epstein's famous remarks on the commonness of this practice (Aruch HaShulchan OC 75:7) were published in 1903, and Rabbi Kagen's (Mishnah Berurah OC 75:2) in 1881; both of them are clearly referring to what is then an already very well established practice. So too, even a casual survey of Lithuanian Yiddish and Hebrew fiction of the late 1800s indicates that most of women in the observant community of Lithuania did not cover their hair in the 1800s; see for example the well known Yiddish writer Yitzchak Moshe Rumsch's work, Se'ar She-ba'isha (Vilna, 1894) for a "fictionalized" discussion of these issues. Michael J. Broyde Professor of Law Emory University School of Law 1301 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322 Email: <mbroyde@...> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jacob Richman <jrichman@...> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 19:28:13 +0300 Subject: Language videos uploaded to TeacherTube Hi Everyone! Several teachers emailed me that their schools block access to YouTube and that I should upload the language videos to TeacherTube. Thanks to everyone for the suggestion. I uploaded all my language videos today to Teacher Tube. The address is: http://www.teachertube.com/uvideos.php?UID=7377&type=public If you do not have a TeacherTube account (free) you can still see the videos by visiting: http://www.teachertube.com and doing a search on "learn English" or "learn Hebrew" or "Learn Spanish". Feedback is welcome! Have a good day, Jacob ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Shoshana L. Boublil <toramada@...> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 18:36:29 +0300 Subject: Re: Married Women and Hair Covering > From: Avi Feldblum <feldblum@...> > It appears to me that we have probably three related topics under > discussion here, and being clear on what one is replying to is important. > The three topics I see are: > > 1) A historical question: What was the common practice of married women > in Lithuania regarding covering their hair after marriage? > > 2) A halachic question: In a place where the common practice of married > women is to not cover their hair, is there a prohibition on men (and > possibly women) to say Shema in the presence on a married woman with > uncovered hair > > 3) A halachic question: In a place where the common practice of married > women is to not cover their hair, is there a prohibition on a married > women to go out of her house with her hair uncovered? Avi gave an excellent summary of the current knowledge on these 3 issues. I would like to talk about them from a more sociological point of view, based on my experience as a Kallah guide; a rabbi's wife and from interviewing many women over the years. My mother, a Stern College graduate, from a rabbinical Lithuanian family told me how her mother (a rabbi's wife herself) started to cover her hair after my mother covered her own hair when she got married. This and other discussions got me thinking. When the discussion of hair covering comes up, I always ask the women I'm talking to: "Why do you have to cover your hair?" The answer gives a giant pointer to resolving the above 3 issues. Many women say b/c of tzni'ut; b/c it is "ervah" for a woman's hair to be loose and seen. Few talk about halachic sources such as the Isha Sotah whose hair is "displayed" as a part of the process and testing she undergoes. But if hair were truly "ervah" -- you wouldn't find Sephardi psika that allows a certain amount of hair to be seen (and forbids sheitels). So apparently the issue is more complex. In fact "ervah" in other contexts refers to "things that are covered". Therefore, if the standard skirt length in society is floor length, showing the ankle would be "ervah". The issue is discussed in depth when dealing with the halachic definitions of tzniut between man and wife in the privacy of their room. The flip side is that if it becomes common practice for women's hair to be seen, it is no longer "ervah", and a woman does not need to cover it. OTOH, when putting this question to women, who have studied in modern Midrashot, where more time is spent on halachic sources and g'mara learning, the majority of women answer that hair covering is b/c of Isha Sotah, as a Chok -- a law which we don't understand, but must follow. These answers cover the 3 issues raised here. If covering the hair is an issue of tzniut (modesty) then "ervah" refers to what is commonly covered, and in a society where women no longer cover their hair in public, hair is no longer "ervah" and women go without covering their hair. In this case, as it is no longer "ervah", you can obviously say Shema in the presence of uncovered women's hair. But, for women who were taught that hair covering was "Dat Yehudit" and a chok derived from Sotah (a woman suspected of being an unfaithful woman), covering the hair is a law, it has nothing to do with ervah beyond that the question is how much of the hair has to be covered. In such a case, as there is no halachic possibility of accepting uncovered hair, it remains "ervah" in the sense that it should be covered, and therefore you cannot say Shema in front of uncovered hair. But like in all cases of covering, there is a legitimate question of how much has to be covered, and this is the source of the many different styles of hair covering found among religious Religious Zionist women in Israel. Rav Ellinson brings in his books sources for different measures and definitions of what has to be covered, by what (is a net sufficient or does it have to be opaque?) and the impact of location on the hair covering to be worn. I see this as another instance in which the women's world of worshipping Hashem has shifted from the area of pure spirituality, feelings, "Worship from the Heart" which was more common pre-WW; where mothers taught their daughters most of what they knew about Avodat Hashem and halacha, where Avodat Hashem was connected to oral learning and lore; into the field of pure Halacha, where women's knowledge of Avodat Hashem has become more connected with book learning and written resources. Shoshana L. Boublil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: <Meirhwise@...> (Rabbi Wise) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:29:27 EDT Subject: Re: Married Women and Hair Covering In the married women's hair covering debate surely the Ben Ish Hai was talking about Bagdad - not Lithuania! I have yet to see a recognised posek who allows married women to leave their hair uncovered ab initio. The only disagreement between Reb Moshe Feinstein and Rav Ovaydia Yosef was whether or not she loses her ketuba on divorce! This is hardly a heter!!! Rabbi Wise ----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of Volume 54 Issue 78